American
Age
By Mike Mahn
IPS Features


Return to Current IPS Features

IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






Searching for Light

 America became fully engaged with the world only reluctantly. Actually, the world engaged America and we responded. Our deep isolationist sleep ended on December 7, 1941, when sirens wailed in Pearl Harbor. We were then summoned to protect our national interests. Barely two weeks later, Nazi Germany declared war on us for waging war against its Axis Ally, Imperial Japan. Within the space of 11 days, we were challenged across the Pacific into Asia, and across the Atlantic into Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. When the great wars ended, we were the last nation standing that was stronger than when the conflagrations began. A new world order had been born.

The missionary, redeeming spirit of America was roused. We poured our wealth into rebuilding the very nations we had destroyed, leaving democracy and free-market capitalism as our legacy so that the vanquished could become self-sufficient. We sought to bind ourselves and all others into a common family through the United Nations, so that such wars could not occur in the future. We hoped we could return to our pre-war days of self-centered isolationism, having fixed the world’s troubles. Though our intentions were noble, the world was still troubled and darkness covered large portions.

Communism was in ascendancy, its mortal enemy, Nazi Germany, now vanquished and opportunity abounding in the vacuum left by the economic collapse of the European colonial powers. Spurred aggressively by the Soviet Union, it reached across China into Southeast Asia, spread into Africa and established a beachhead off the coast of America at Cuba, from where it extended its reach into South America and Latin America. Thus it was that we had to establish and maintain alliances to defend against the gathering threat, deepening and extending our influence and engagement around the globe.

Our strategic policy was to contain the menace and seek to build regional alliances (NATO, SEATO, ANZUS), anchored by American policy and tethered to our financial and military support that would enable each participant to remain free from the intimidation and influence of communism. Our resolve would be tested in the early 50’s in Korea, though we would sit idle and abandon the desperate, freedom-seeking people of Hungary, who sought to implant democracy, but were brutally crushed in 1956 by Soviet forces. The continuing test would continue, rising in Cuba in 1962, then manifesting in Vietnam a year later. America responded to both, though the latter drew the nation into a 10 years’ commitment of blood (58,000) and treasure that would culminate in withdrawal and then defeat of the abandoned ally, South Vietnam.

Following the disaster of Vietnam, America turned inward. The Soviet Union was economically exhausted, but still voracious and anxious to exploit the perceived weakness of America. Others also sensed opportunity in our Asian distraction. War in the Mideast erupted as Soviet-financed proxy states attacked Israel in 1967 and, again, in 1973. Oil-producing, Arab-dominated nations formed a cartel, OPEC, that would bring western, pro-Israel nations to their knees, economically, in 1974, and virtually emasculate oil-dependent Europe.

Iran exploded as the Ayatollah Khomeini returned in 1978 and launched a revolution, ousting the pro-West Shah and seizing American hostages. The Ayatollah would seek to use vast, American armaments, previously given to the Shah, to oust the regime of Saddam Hussein in neighboring Iraq, which was dominated by an Islamic faction (Sunni) that was hostile to the dominant faction in Iran (Sh’ia). A bloody, eight (8) years war of attrition would follow as America supported Iraq against its new regional rival.

In 1980, the Soviets would seize Afghanistan and seek to further extend its influence in the Middle East and thereby grasp the throat of the oil supply upon which so many of the industrialized, western nations depended. Beset around the globe, the once preeminent America was now on the run or in retreat in all theatres of engagement. A new generation in Europe, totally dependent on American protection from the Soviet threat, protested against the U.S. military presence. 

Americans chose a new direction with a more determined and aggressive approach to the global challenges, electing Ronald Reagan, whose message was more hopeful though the threats were still dangerous as ever. NATO was reinvigorated and the pressure on the Soviets was increased to the breaking point as the U.S.S.R. faced economic collapse seeking to contend with American military technological advances. The Soviet Union would collapse in 1989 when the Berlin Wall fell. It would dissolve 2 years later.

Just when congressional free-spenders were excited about the ‘peace dividend’ following the end of the Cold War, Iraq invaded Kuwait and threatened the world’s largest oil supplier, Saudi Arabia. America was drawn, again, into a deeper involvement in the Middle East, which it had previously sought to avoid. Thus began the 12 years cycle of warfare with Iraq, beginning with the ouster of the Iraqis from Kuwait in 1991, followed by inept UN enforcement, and the final conquest and removal of Hussein in 2003.

Throughout the last 25 years, sparked by the triumphal return of the Ayatollah to Iran, and the resurrection of militant Islam, there has been a new, growing threat not just to America, but to all non-Islam’s in the world. America is the principal threat and the deadly strike on September 11, 2001, was a rousing, wake-up to this reality. Now we are engaged in a high-stakes encounter in Iraq, seeking, for the first time, to implant democracy and western-style freedom in a nation and amidst a people that has customs and a culture last modified in the Seventh Century. It is uncertain whether this can be done successfully and in a lasting manner, but the alternative is grim.

We desperately want to return home, to shed the worries of the world, and to seek the light in the comfort of our homes. We seek no gain in these foreign adventures. We question whether the effort is worth the blood and expense. Debate rages at home and divides our nation as bitterly as ever. We are forced to ask whether we are called to engage the world from pride, our whether this is a service that is divinely-charged and missionary.

We dare not admit the latter, but it is fair to ask whether America has been so blessed because the Divine Power sought to allow us, alone, to share such bounty, or whether the blessings and power have been loaned so that we might share them around the globe. We wonder why so many others whom we have helped during the last century will not undertake some measure of responsibility for helping to carry this burden. It is very tempting to come home, for we are all weary, and bring our lamp with us, and cover it so none others may see the light.

All features should be treated as copyrighted by IPS Features and/or the individual authors.  Reproduction may be made for individual use.  Reproduction for commercial use is prohibited except for use by subscribing members of IPS Features.  For information, email pop@ipsfeatures.com.