Comment

IPS Features


Return to Current IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






Term limits a no-winner

It is a miracle the Republicans took over Congress in 1994, considering such lame leaders as Newt Gingrich took the helm.  The Contract with America sounded good as a one liner, but had no real substance.

The dumbest part of it was the pledge of term limits.  Many qualified office holders were tainted by the rhetoric.  Along the way they forgot the advantages of seniority in office.   They forgot it is the wisdom, or lack of, that put them in office.  It should be the wisdom, or lack of, that either keeps them there or shows them the door.

Term limits take away that precious privilege of the people.

Some qualified representatives stepped down when the term limit they set expired.  Others broke their word and ran again.  It was a choice of losing a seat or losing face.

The same scenario appeared across the country.

In Tennessee’s Third Congressional District, Rep. Zach Wamp was elected in 1994 with the pledge he would serve six terms--12 years--and step down.  Currently, he is running for his six term, which will expire in 2006.

His interest is well known in running for the US Senate now held by Bill Frist and presumably to be vacant.  Rep. Wamp and Chattanooga Mayor Bob Corker are both considered potential candidates.  They have said they will not run against each other.

Picture this—if Mayor Corker goes for the Senate seat, Rep. Wamp faces the choice of breaking his pledge or gong back to private work, such as the real estate job he held with Fletcher Bright.

Some are insisting he should keep his pledge and not run after serving 12 years.  Other say his service is important to his district.  It’s a tough choice, one only he can make.