Voice
in the Crowd
By
Pete Chaney
IPS Features


Return to Current IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






9/11 Commission missed the point

Not since the assassination of John Kennedy has the American government had such an exhaustive investigation.  Every detail of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center is documented in exhaustive fashion.  You know all you want to know about the religious fanatics who hijacked airliners and used them as guided missiles.  You know the last words of the heroic struggle to retake one of the planes.  You know the American intelligence community was asleep and ignored warning signs.

Years earlier the findings of the Warren Commission called Lee Harvey Oswald the sole conspirator in the death of President John Kennedy.  It raised more questions than it answered.  Likely the report on 9/11 may do the same things for a definite reason.

In the newspaper business to write a story, you ask six questions.  They are called the five Ws and an H.  Who?  What?  When?  Where?  Why?  And How?

Both commissions followed the system faithfully, with one exception.  They didn’t delve into why the acts were committed.

We accept that Lincoln was killed by John Wilkes Booth, through a deranged revenge for the Civil War.  We accept that William McKinley was shot by a jobseeker who had been denied a job.  Tragic, but it made sense.

Kennedy’s assassination was not as easy to answer.  Some still wonder just why Oswald would take it on himself to act alone.  There will always be unanswered questions.

The 9/11 Commission didn’t have to look very far to see why Osama bin Laden’s terrorists attacked us.  But did they?  Does the 9/11 report address the seeds of hatred that brought on the worst tragedy to hit American shores?

Religious hatred was old when Moses told the Pharaoh to “let my people go.”  Wars were waged.  Genocide was used to eliminate opposing religions.  During the Middle Ages, knights in armor were expected to make a pilgrimage to the Holy Land—to free Jerusalem from the “infidels.”  The infidels had a religion different from Christianity.  They had the idea that their Islamic beliefs were the only one, and the Christians were the Infidels.  At one time, Muslims had conquered half the known world. 

During the Dark Ages, the doctors in the European world might carve a cross on a patient’s forehead to release the evil spirits causing a headache.  The Middle East physicians prescribed herbs and diet.  A leader named Saladin, born to a Kurdish family in Mesopotamia, captured Jerusalem and held it against crusading knights.  The Christian nations had their crusades.  He launched his own holy war, his jihad to spread the Islamic religion.

That was in the 12th Century, 13 hundred years ago.  Religious hatred is still alive and well in the Middle East.  The nucleus has been the failure of the Israelis and Arabs, particularly in Palestine, to live together.  Other nations, particularly America, have been pulled into the burning slaughter of lives and hope for peace.  Palestine sends a suicide bomber over to kill Israelis.  Then Israel sends over a tank to retaliate.  The cycle escalated instead of improving.

The 9/11 Commission could easily see the cause of bin Laden’s jihad.  Hatred of Israel and anyone associated with them, hatred of anyone not of his faith.  America was the target.  He wanted his own Holy War.  Although he is not the military genius Saladin was, he found fertile hatred in the Muslim world.

America’s leaders have learned nothing from the Israel-Palestine conflict.  Bombs and tanks don’t cure hate.  Communication and understanding does.  No one can build enough defense systems to stop one fanatic seething with hatred.  As one Islamic leader said, kill one terrorist and it inspires ten more.

The world is smaller daily.  We have to root out the seeds of hatred and learn to live together.  There is no other way.  The 9/11 Commission should have seen that.