Voice
in the Crowd
By
Pete Chaney
IPS Features


Return to Current IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






Sen. Dole, be an American first

Bob Dole and John McCain are two men revered by veterans.  Either one would have made a great American president.  Veterans rallied to their cause when they ran.  Dole ran against Bill Clinton when Clinton sought reelection, after first defeating another honored veteran, George Herbert Walker Bush.  Too much of a gentleman to play dirty politics, Dole did not slam Clinton for remaining in Europe during the Vietnam War, hiding behind a student deferment.

After his years in the senate and, most definitely, his scars from military service, Bob Dole had everything it took to be president.  Everything, except a sense of humor.  If he had campaigned with as much personality as he appeared on Saturday Night Live and the Viagra ads, he would have won.

John McCain was on the high road to winning the Republican nomination for president four years ago.  The Bush campaign smeared mud on everything from his character to his military service, even letting some floating the idea that he collaborated with the Viet Cong while he was a prisoner.  The Bush bankroll crushed his chances.

Dole and McCain are great Americans, icons to any political party and to their country.  That’s what makes it hard to understand why they accept the same mudsling tactics and butcher’s knife against a fellow veteran.

To his credit, McCain did ask attacks against John Kerry’s war record be stopped.  He didn’t say it loud enough as the slander continued and he campaigned with President George W. Bush.

Now, Bob Dole wants to know how much blood Kerry shed for three Purple Hearts.  Come on, Sen. Dole.  How much blood does it take?  This is a question of the military integrity that certified the medals, not Kerry.  You, of all people Sen. Dole, know the horror of war and that no one goes out looking for a Purple Heart.  It comes the hard way. The military doesn’t give medals lightly.  They are verified.  For you and your boat buddies who question the military records on Kerry’s service, you are discrediting not Kerry but the American military system.  Has anyone thought of that?

Everybody is trying to trash John Kerry’s service to his country, based on floating accusations and gossip.  Nobody has taken a close look at the conduct during the Vietnam War of President Bush or Dick Cheney.  If Bill Clinton was a draft dodger, going to school in Europe for a draft deferment, what were the actions of Dubya Bush and Cheney.

The president joined the National Guard.  That’s honorable service.  He could have been called to active duty.  But, at the same time, if he wanted to show his patriotism he could have volunteered for active duty.  Al Gore did.  John Kerry did.

The Bush campaign has performed a magnificent task of taking a certain weakness of the Bush-Cheney team and turning it against the opposition.  Instead of having to defend their lack of active duty during Vietnam, they promote the issue that Kerry was a traitor even after he served with valor.

Even Cheney, who has never even wore a uniform or heard a shot fired in anger and had five draft deferments for schooling, has thrown in his opinion that Kerry is unfit to be president because he is too weak.  No one who went to Vietnam was weak.

The Bush camp has made their whole campaign one centered on Kerry’s military service.

The question of Bush invading Iraq on faulty evidence that fit into the plans is ignored.  The staggering national deficit is brushed aside as unimportant.  Tax breaks that reward the wealthiest segments of the population and give pennies to the working class are cited as something to be proud of.  A Medicare bill giving the pharmacies access to the national treasury is called a victory for the poor, when prices escalate to new heights.  With 18-million jobs lost and companies hiring people in India are given tax breaks, the campaign keeps saying, “Prosperity is just around the corner.”

Seems to me a fellow named Herbert Hoover said the same thing.

Back to Sen. Bob Dole, especially.  No one ever asked you how many drops of blood you shed on the battlefield.  Loyalty to any political party should come second to being an American.

Get on with the questions that are important in the election.  Accept that John Kerry served on active duty in Vietnam.  Accept that George W. Bush served with the National Guard in this country.  Now, who will make the better president for the next four years?

We know what the world was like before the inauguration of the Bush-Cheney team.  We know what has happened since they took office.  In all honesty, it is time to be objective and ask ourselves if they will give America more of the same or make an improvement.

We must decide if a team of John Kerry and John Edwards can make the world a better place than we live in now.  Can they restore America’s reputation and trust in the family of nations?  Can they stop the flood of jobs overseas and the hemorrhaging of our precious assets?

These are the questions to be asking, Sen. Dole, not how many drops of blood were shed on the battlefield.  It’s more important to be an American than a Republican or Democrat.