Voice
in the Crowd
By
Pete Chaney
IPS Features


Return to Current IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






All quiet on the Iraqi front

Being a Monday morning quarterback is a job almost anyone can fill.  You sit comfortably in an easy chair and can say with certainty what play should have been used by the quarterback in Sunday’s foo tball game. After the game is over you can be certain what inning the coach should have changed pitchers or when the basketball superstar should have been given a timeout.

With the perspective of time and looking back, it’s easy to consider everything and know the right call.

It’s a lot different in the heat of the moment.  That is particularly true in war and battle.

A soldier in the midst of a firefight can’t pause to consider the merits of his situation, or why he’s there.  He can only follow orders.  As Rudyard Kipling wrote in his Charge of the Light Brigade, the troops followed orders because it was “theirs not to reason why.” 

A soldier obeys the command he is given.  Anarchy and chaos take control if he does not.

A lot of writers are coming out with books now reexamining The War to End All Wars.  Various Monday morning quarterback have analyzed the events of World War I with a microscope, looking back from the vantage point of 90 years.  It’s not quite the same as the world temperament at the time.

The world was at peace the first of June in 1914.  No one even thought of war.  Archduke Ferdinand was on an official visit to Sarajevo when he was assassinated on June 28.  He wasn’t very popular with his own people, but Germany and Austria began posturing and rattling sabers.  Everyone started rattling sabers and honoring alliances.  But that was all it was, until the first week in August of that year when the carnage began.  No one wanted to look weak.

The machine gun and rapid firing rifles had come into their own.  You could kill people quicker.  One day in 1916 during the Battle of the Somme, 50,000 British troops were killed—marching obediently into the blistering fire across no man’s land between the trenches.  Some trenches were 30 feet deep.  At places, the space of trenches between friend and foe was only a few yards.

It was also a war where the soldiers sensed the futility.  Commanders were harsh with deserters.  The French shot some 600 and the British executed around 400.  When the casualty rate became unbearable, a French unit mutinied in 1917.

Americans reelected Woodrow Wilson for a second term in 1916, because “he kept us out war.”  A year later America was at war.

My father was still a teenager and my grandmother had to sign for him to join the Home Guard in Virginia.  He went to France with the 29th Infantry Division and fought in the trenches.  Luckily, he came back alive, only weakened by the pneumonia that killed more people at that time than the Bubonic Plague.

Looking back now, most agree it was the wrong war for the wrong reasons.  Poets wrote of the cleansing of society of war, as if wading through a bloody battlefield could make something clean.  The result was that Germany was a fertile ground for Adolph Hitler and Russia was too weak to resist a Communist takeover.

German author Erich Maria Remarque wrote “All Quiet on the Western Front” about the futility of World War I.  On a day when there was little action and headquarters reported it was all quiet on the western front, the main person in his story—a young man with dreams and a future—was killed.

Had my father been killed on a “quiet” day on the front, I would not have been born.  My children and their children would never have come into the world.

Some historians believe the two wars that destroyed that which needed to be destroyed were the Civil War and World War II.  Perhaps Lincoln best described war with one word—devastating.

Since the two world wars, each of which had a different scope, world leaders have been torn between inaction for fear of doing the wrong thing or taking action to prevent a worse calamity.

It is said that President John Kennedy had “The Guns of August,” a book about World War I, beside his bed the night he wrestled with decisions on the Cuban missile crisis.  At the same time, the specter of Hitler rising to power unchecked at Munich was in his mind.  He took action.

History will decide if President George W. Bush did the right thing in invading Iraq, or if it was the wrong war for the wrong reasons.  Events will determine if he took a step toward snuffing out terrorism or only inflamed it.

As of now the death toll of Americans stands over 1,000.  Other casualties reach above 10,000.  These aren’t statistics.  They are human beings with ambitions and plans that will never be.

Kipling was very much a nationalist for England at the outset of World War I.  When his son was killed on the battlefield, he wrote:

“If any question why we died

“Tell them, because our fathers lied.”

One day in the future, perhaps some military headquarters will send out a dispatch saying, all quiet on the Iraqi front.  Let us pray there won’t be another statistic that means a life was lost.